What I mean is the thickness of the shell between your fingers, or on top of your head. The very first thing I noticed when I put it on is how thin it is. So lets talk about some of the features that this helmet brings to the table and what makes it great. That’s good because when you are considering spending $250 on a helmet, essentially the top of the range for most manufacturers, you don’t want to be relying on one feature that you can’t measure yourself. Even if you gained nothing in terms of aerodynamics, this would still be a helmet I’d recommend. It’s a great helmet for a lot of reasons, and the aero is an added value. That’s definitely the place I think the Smith Overtake helmet finds itself. You don’t lose anything and you stand the potential to gain something, so why not? Luckily for the consumer, many of the aero claims out there come as a value added proposition. A company produces a new product and tells you it’s more aero than before and more aero than the competition, and you have to choose to either believe them or not. It’s absolutely a marketer’s dream because you have to take their word for it. The tricky thing about this new metric is that unlike how stiff or light something is, you can’t easily measure it. It hasn’t replaced lightweight, or stiffness for that matter, but it’s literally reshaping the market. In today’s cycling landscape, a new performance metric has been introduced.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |